"Not so fast, my friend." This is a popular expression of ESPN sportscaster Lee Corso to describe his anticipated surprise announcement for his legions of football fans that sends college football into a tizzy. For political observers, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's op ed announcement in Thursday New York Times might qualify for the Corso response. It is apparent from Bloomberg's announcement, as well as illuminating background information from the Associated Press on the same day and same subject, that up until his announcement, Bloomberg was struggling mightily with the decision to run. Although I am not involved in any of the political races, it does occur to me that there is still a strong possibility that a Bloomberg for President may still be alive. My source--intuition and logic. Consider the following:
The strategic significance of Bloomberg supporters initiating the ballot initiative, perhaps as early as Tuesday, March 4th, is that is the earliest the effort could start a petition drive in the critical state of Texas, with one of the earliest deadlines. The Mayor said, in his Thursday New York Times piece, that he wanted to influence the parties and their respective presidential campaigns. Perhaps unlike any other political figure in America, including Ralph Nadar, Mayor Bloomberg could render almost unlimited influence over the national campaign. Is it possible that he might even render more influence over some of the national issues, than even the candidates themselves? "Not so fast, my friend"...think about it. Could it be that a sustaining Bloomberg ballot drive could be the best and maybe only hope for those citizens feeling somewhat disenfranchised to still influence this most critical election.
From a political standpoint, Bloomberg passes the laugh test. Unlike Ralph Nader or some independent conservative who may run because they perceive John McCain as too liberal, a Bloomberg candidacy would not be a quixotic quest. He would have as I mentioned the money, billions in fact to run a credible campaign. He would offer a viable electable alternative to the two major parties along with a track record of accomplishment in New York City. Further, he would be the perfect problem solver candidate versus the charismatic but unproven Obama and the cranky Washington Senator John McCain. He would be competitive with a chance to win New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Missouri, California, Washington, Oregon, Wisconsin, Michigan, and yes even Florida.
Although I disclosed that my source for this information is my own, I do acknowledge that I have previously had conversations with people associated with the Mayor. Unlike, perhaps Governor Huckabee and others, I do not think Mayor Bloomberg needs to run to send a message or influence the respective party platforms. With his wealth, astute timing, and extraordinary good luck, described above, it just probably is the right time for the announcement of his candidacy...on or about March 4th, 2008.
The announcement by Mayor Bloomberg will be the equivalent of the shot heard around the political world. For Barack Obama it will be like waking up on Christmas and all of the presents are missing for it will be Bloomberg not Obama getting the coverage on March 5 despite the fact that Obama will have finished off Hillary Clinton (that it will be yesterday’s news). For John McCain, it will mean that he is even more yesterday’s candidate and how does his cash strapped campaign compete against Obama’s millions let alone Bloomberg’s billions. For voters it will mean that they can be prepared for more twists and turns before Election Day.
Bob McKnight is a former Florida Democratic State Representative and State Senator and author of The Golden Years. Additional information on him may be obtained at bobmcknight.com.